What to confirm first
Mark question type, position, two topic sentences, and the function of examples first.
Connect the sample, template sentence, prompt-analysis, logic, vocabulary, or grammar issue to one step that can be verified through revision. The point is not memorising one answer.
Chinese long-tail pages need concrete writing steps so they do not become thin content.
Memorising sample sentences can misfit position, examples, and logic in a new prompt.
If you cannot explain why the sample is strong, it has not become training material.
First of all, technology saves a lot of time in our daily life. For example, when we go to a new place, we do not need to ask people or remember the way, we just use the map App on the phone. Besides, we can pay by phone, buy things online and talk with friend…
Marked line: where the diagnosis located the main blocker in this learner-written essay.Coherence & cohesion 6
Sample diagnostic, not an official IELTS score.
Mark question type, position, two topic sentences, and the function of examples first.
Imitate only one structural move, such as thesis or reason-example-so what.
The value of a Band 7+ sample is not its sentences but the chain of decisions behind them: why this position instead of the easier one? Why does paragraph two explain the mechanism before the example? Why does the concession only concede halfway? Memorising sentences carries none of these decisions, so the next new prompt starts from zero again. Annotate each paragraph with "what the writer did here and why" — worth more than copying ten nice sentences.
"Remote work reduces urban congestion. (claim: supports the position) When employees commute only twice a week, peak-hour traffic drops measurably. (mechanism: why the claim holds) Amsterdam recorded a 15% fall in rush-hour volume after flexible-work policies spread. (evidence: one is enough) This directly addresses the overcrowding that critics of city growth worry about. (link back to the prompt)" Each sentence has one job; none is decoration. Most Band 6 paragraphs jump from claim straight to example — the missing mechanism sentence is exactly what "underdeveloped ideas" means.
A sample cannot give you: the ability to generate a position for a new prompt, the ability to chain your own ideas into mechanisms, or awareness of your own recurring grammar habits. All three can only be trained on your own writing. The efficient loop: dissect one sample for decisions, write your own essay, then diagnose which decision failed to happen.
Put your essay beside a same-prompt sample and ask only four questions: which sentence carries the position in each? How many ideas per body paragraph in each? What follows the example in the sample — and is your example the dead end of the paragraph? What does the sample conclusion do — and does yours just repeat the opening? These four map onto the most common Band 6-to-7 boundaries across the four criteria.
Connect the sample, template sentence, prompt-analysis, logic, vocabulary, or grammar issue to one step that can be verified through revision. The point is not memorising one answer.
Memorising sample sentences can misfit position, examples, and logic in a new prompt.
If you cannot explain why the sample is strong, it has not become training material. Imitate only one structural move, such as thesis or reason-example-so what.
Banfen Writing focuses on targeted score-gap repair. Use a real essay to pinpoint your conservative band range, core blockers, text evidence, and next revision steps.
These pages explain the Banfen Writing diagnostic and blocker-repair method, Task 1 overview, Task 2 development, and common score blockers.
Submit the prompt and essay, inspect criteria, essay evidence, and the next rewrite target first, then decide whether to train sample analysis, template sentences, logic, or language control.
More than a simple comment list. Identify the priority blocker in your draft and guide you to revise with proven results.