What to confirm before writing
Write question type, position, body 1 role, body 2 role, and one example for each.
Chinese writing problem diagnosis
A Task 2 outline should expose structure risk first.
Turn the IELTS Writing problem into one diagnosable writing step that can be verified through revision. The goal is not more templates; it is knowing what to repair first in the next version.
Diagnose one real essay first, then decide what to revise next.
Common mistake
Many essays look off-task only after writing, but the outline often already shows incomplete answer scope.
Diagnostic evidence
If the two body paragraphs are only two examples without separate claims, the outline is not stable enough.
Real IELTS essay diagnosis
First of all, technology saves a lot of time in our daily life. For example, when we go to a new place, we do not need to ask people or remember the way, we just use the map App on the phone. Besides, we can pay by phone, buy things online and talk with friend…
Marked line: where the diagnosis located the main blocker in this learner-written essay.Coherence & cohesion 6
Main blocker
Body paragraph role is unclear
6–7conservative band range
268 words
Sample diagnostic, not an official IELTS score.
What to revise after checking
Fix the outline before the essay. Move each paragraph from claim to reason to example.
- Whether the full task is answered
- Whether two paragraphs have roles
- Whether examples serve claims
FAQ
What problem does Chinese Task 2 outline solve?
Turn the IELTS Writing problem into one diagnosable writing step that can be verified through revision. The goal is not more templates; it is knowing what to repair first in the next version.
What evidence should I check first for Chinese Task 2 outline?
Many essays look off-task only after writing, but the outline often already shows incomplete answer scope.
What should I redo after reading Chinese Task 2 outline?
If the two body paragraphs are only two examples without separate claims, the outline is not stable enough. Fix the outline before the essay. Move each paragraph from claim to reason to example.
Is Chinese Task 2 outline an AI essay checker?
Banfen Writing focuses on targeted score-gap repair. Use a real essay to pinpoint your conservative band range, core blockers, text evidence, and next revision steps.
Guides
Keep going with these guides.
These pages explain the Banfen Writing diagnostic and blocker-repair method, Task 1 overview, Task 2 development, and common score blockers.
Home
雅思写作批改看懂了，下一篇还是不会改？提交一篇真实 IELTS Task 2，先看保守参考分数区间、主卡分点和原文证据；由你自己重写一段、完成整篇第二稿，再对比修改前后变化。首次合格诊断免费；确认确有主卡分点后，可一次性选择 7 天 ¥29 或 31 天 ¥99 写作修复期，一次只进行 1 轮且不自动续费。
Writing guides
按正在写的题目查找雅思写作指南：小作文图型、overview 与数据取舍，大作文题型、立场与主体段展开，以及批改后的同题重写步骤。每篇指南都要求你回到自己的作文验证一个具体改动。
Writing checker
使用 IELTS Writing checker 时，不要只看一个分数。更有用的是找出 Task Response、Coherence、Lexical Resource 或 Grammar 中最影响训练的主卡分点。
Chinese AI checker
使用雅思写作 AI 批改时，不要只看 band、错误清单或自动生成的范文。检查器应基于题目与原文，判断 Task Response、Coherence、Lexical Resource 或 Grammar 中最影响目标分的主卡分点，引用对应句段，并给出下一版可验证的重写步骤；结果是学习诊断，不是官方 IELTS 分数。
Chinese band descriptors
雅思写作评分标准包括 Task Response、Coherence、Lexical Resource 和 Grammar。重写时要先找主卡分点。
Task 2 outline critique
IELTS Task 2 开写前先做 outline critique，用 10 分钟检查题目回应、立场平衡、主体段证据和展开链，避免写完整篇后才发现方向偏薄。
Chinese Task 2 template
雅思大作文模板不能一套到底。先区分观点题、讨论题、问题解决题和优缺点题。
Task 2 position
IELTS Task 2 清晰立场不只是开头写同意或反对，还要让 thesis、topic sentence、主体段理由和 conclusion 持续回答同一问题。通过 agree/disagree、discussion 与双问题题型识别立场漂移、范围过大或让步失控的原文证据，再把问题收窄成一次可检查的开头或段落重写。
Chinese position drift
雅思大作文立场漂移常发生在 discuss both views、agree disagree 和金钱幸福题。先诊断标准是否稳定。
Problem solution sample
雅思问题解决类作文先区分 problem、cause 与 solution，再用原因—解决方案矩阵检查配对。每个方案都要写清执行者、行动、机制和预期结果。用范文逻辑反查自己原稿中的论证链断点，锁定最拖分的卡分点，完成一次有针对性的段落重写与对比复盘，在真实写作中检验修改效果，而不是盲目死记硬背整篇范文模板。
Task 2 question analysis
雅思大作文审题要先拆题型、命令词、讨论对象和限制条件，避免偏题和立场漂移。
Start diagnosis
Check one real IELTS essay first.
Submit the prompt and essay to get the main blocker, essay evidence, and next revision target first.
More than a simple comment list. Identify the priority blocker in your draft and guide you to revise with proven results.
References