Diagnostic evidence
Submit the same essay to two tools and compare which one cites repeated essay evidence and which gives template advice. More evidence means more actionable feedback.
Writing score-gap diagnostic boundary
Compare IELTS writing tools by diagnosis quality, not by score features.
When comparing Writing9 with alternatives, check the same criteria for each tool: whether it provides a score estimate, cites essay evidence, names one priority issue, and turns feedback into one rewrite. Verify each criterion instead of assuming any tool has these capabilities.
This page does not evaluate competitors; it gives comparison criteria.
Common mistake
Score accuracy and interface familiarity are incomplete criteria. Also check whether score boundaries are clear, essay evidence is cited, one blocker is prioritised, and the advice is specific.
What to revise after feedback
After receiving feedback from the chosen tool, do one thing only: turn one suggestion into a same-paragraph rewrite and verify the change.
What to confirm first
Prepare one essay and list the three capabilities you care about: score estimate, essay evidence, and revision step. Then verify each one.
- Whether the score is conservative with evidence
- Whether it names one priority issue
- Whether suggestions become a revision step
The boundary of AI correction tools
Treat any AI tool output as a clue to check against your own essay, not as an official score or a final draft. Be cautious of tools that promise official score prediction or guaranteed improvement.
How to use the comparison
Whatever tool you choose, the learning path is the same: one real essay -> conservative range -> main blocker -> essay evidence -> next revision step. The tool is only the first step.
Guides
Keep going with these guides.
These pages explain the Banfen Writing diagnostic and blocker-repair method, Task 1 overview, Task 2 development, and common score blockers.
Home
半分写作是雅思写作练习网站。在雾港写作通关里选择 Task 1 来信或 Task 2 议事局，从自己的判断和短句写到完整作文。登录后免费玩 4 关，进度自动保存；也可先做一道短练习，获得点评并修改。
Writing guides
按正在写的题目查找雅思写作指南：小作文图型、overview 与数据取舍，大作文题型、立场与主体段展开，以及批改后的同题重写步骤。每篇指南都要求你回到自己的作文验证一个具体改动。
Writing checker
使用 IELTS Writing checker 时，分数之外还要看主卡分点。更有用的是找出 Task Response、Coherence、Lexical Resource 或 Grammar 中最影响训练的主卡分点。
Essay feedback
在线 IELTS 作文反馈要比总评和错误清单多走一步。用原文证据定位一个主卡分点，对照评分维度，再完成一次可检查的重写。带着自己的原文逐项检查，再用一次有目标的重写验证判断。
AI evaluator
IELTS Writing AI evaluator 的价值在于快速出 band 和列出错误之外，还能把题目和原文映射到 TR/CC/LR/GRA，找出最影响目标分的主卡分点并引用具体证据。好的评估会说明分数的误差范围，把问题收窄成下一版可验证的段落修改步骤，让学习者自己完成重写；结果用于学习参考，官方 IELTS 分数以考试为准。
Band range diagnosis
IELTS Writing band score checker 给出分数之外，还要说明依据。提交题目和作文后，更值得关注的是保守分数区间、TR/CC/LR/GRA 四项判断、最影响目标分的主卡分点及原文证据。把这些信息转成下一版 修改步骤，用修改前后变化判断反馈是否有效；结果用于学习参考，官方 IELTS 分数以考试为准。
IELTS Writing AI tool
雅思写作 AI 工具真正有用的地方，不是快速生成高分范文或一次改完所有句子，而是从完整题目与原文中找出最影响目标分的主卡分点，解释它对应 Task Response、Coherence、词汇或语法的证据，再给出下一版可验证的段落重写目标。学习者自己完成 自己重写，才能确认问题是否改善，并检查下一篇能否复用。
Task 1 overview
很多 Task 1 卡分点在 overview：缺失、过泛或主特征抓错。了解 overview 为什么压分，以及下一步该专门练哪个动作。带着原文完成检查，再用重写验证是否真的改善。
Task 2 development
Task 2 想提分，常见的关键是把观点发展成完整论证链。了解薄展开为什么压分，以及下一步该改哪个动作。检查重点：先写 claim、再补为什么成立、再用例子或结果把它撑起来。
Start practising
Confirm the main blocker with one real essay first.
Submit the prompt, essay, target band, and recent band to see a conservative range, main blocker, essay evidence, and next revision step, instead of treating AI feedback or a model essay as the answer.
References